Yes (I also will say again) that applies to you, to me, to Israel Folau ...
And Paul Collins, for goodness sake! He is not nearly as qualified to speak on Christianity than Folau whom he tries to put down with his “He’s a rugby footballer, for goodness sake, not a biblical scholar!”
The sentence doesn't make sense.
And while he is right, unfortunately, when he says that Folau’s views don’t represent the views of the vast majority of Christians, they are in line with what the Bible teaches. Collins is wrong, not Folau
Of course, like Collins, you're entitled to your view. I guess the reader can decide who is more qualified to represent a Christian view.
Responses « Back to index | View thread »