Alex, the article commences:

”The BBC has wholeheartedly thrown its lot in with the liberal reformers; there has been no “impartiality” on any of the big moral issues of the past half-century. In every instance, the socially conservative argument has been depicted as callous, reactionary and dogmatic. Any counterargument to the prevailing liberal consensus is now ignored altogether; social conservative voices are conspicuous by their absence on mainstream current affairs programmes. That is sometimes because there is no one in the production teams who understands the social conservative position, so it is no longer considered when programmes are in the making. The liberals now have a national culture moulded by their thinking and their laws; it is their world now – the old morality has been utterly vanquished. “

Your post commences:

”The BBC offers a balanced mixture of opinions that irks those who expect their licence fee to represent their opinions, and only their assumptions; never the viewpoints of other licence fee payers that may stimulate the viewer/listener to think outside their beliefs, thereby learning that each of us has much to learn when listening to alternative perspectives. “

I guess, ne’er the twain shall meet, but the Catholic Herald approach conforms to the reality that I perceive; yours doesn’t.

You quote from Galatians: ”Yet we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ,” The BBC, on the other hand, focuses on The God Delusion” How are the two compatible?