The problem is, Tony, you asserted that I 'seek to question when I think unreasonable conclusions are being made' [my words] 'only ever along party lines' [your words, my emphasis].

It's meaningless and unverifiable and I tried to demonstrate that by reversing it to apply to you.

If you insist, I'll respond to your assertion less obliquely.

Natural justice requires that an accuser proves their case, not that the accused has to prove their innocence.

You've accused me of 'only ever' questioning on 'party lines'.

'Only ever' is a high bar. 'Party lines' is vague.

For the record and to cut to the chase, my assertion in response is 'Sorry, but that's just not true'.