Maybe in your world it's acceptable to throw accusations around on a public forum without backing them up. If Neil were to explain himself then he might gain more sympathy from all interested parties and not just non-entities, as you so kindly put it, 'Kev'.

Hagger does the same thing, and when he is called out he produces no evidence, just insults.

I don't for one moment doubt the sterling work that Neil did under appallingly conditions, but the constant attacks without any elaboration do him no service.