Re: 9670khz
Posted by This is the truth on June 10, 2023, 7:51 am, in reply to "
9670khz"
|
@ No change Jack: So you are operating a receiving system tuned to 9670 kHz. With this you can of course make extremely weak signals audible. And that 6085 kHz cannot be received with it, because it is not suitable for it, is also self-evident. Thus your statement is the proof that I am right! Mi Amigo from Kall rules !!!
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
 9670khz - No change June 1, 2023, 7:00 pm
- Re: 9670khz - Ray Dio June 1, 2023, 8:19 pm
- Re: 9670khz - AgB June 1, 2023, 9:14 pm
- Re: 9670khz - Mike Simmonds June 1, 2023, 10:37 pm
- Re: 9670khz - No change June 2, 2023, 2:08 pm
- Re: 9670khz - JAM June 4, 2023, 3:58 pm
- Re: 9670khz - Mike Simmonds June 5, 2023, 11:19 am
- Re: 9670khz - Stephen Lewis June 5, 2023, 9:53 pm
- Re: 9670khz - Marco June 7, 2023, 10:13 am
- Re: 9670khz - This is the truth June 9, 2023, 2:11 pm
- Re: 9670khz - This is the truth June 10, 2023, 7:51 am
- Re: 9670khz - Sprog June 11, 2023, 3:42 pm
- Re: 9670khz - Roger Walker June 12, 2023, 10:03 pm
- Re: 9670khz - Radio Channel 292 June 13, 2023, 7:31 am
- Re: 9670khz - j raven June 13, 2023, 12:11 pm
- Re: 9670khz - David U.S. June 16, 2023, 7:20 am
- Re: 9670khz - Mike Simmonds June 16, 2023, 10:56 pm
- Re: 9670khz - David U.S. June 17, 2023, 7:35 am
- Re: 9670khz - Radio Channel 292 June 24, 2023, 6:37 pm
- Re: 9670khz - Radio Channel 292 June 28, 2023, 8:55 am
- Re: 9670khz - This is the truth July 4, 2023, 6:46 pm
- Re: 9670khz - Mike Simmonds July 4, 2023, 7:25 pm
« Back to index |
