Pirate / Free Radio: Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station

Pirate / Free Radio
[ Post a Response | Pirate / Free Radio ]

Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station

Posted by Fred Bramley on January 17, 2022, 7:19 am, in reply to "279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station"

Then throw in southern NDBs
274-275kHz RAF Northolt one example & RAF Lyneham,Wilts.
Plus 2nd harmonic is 558kHz

279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station - The wireless January 17, 2022, 12:01 am

Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station - Fred Bramley January 17, 2022, 7:19 am

Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station - Mike Simmonds January 17, 2022, 10:07 am

Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station - Ray Dio January 17, 2022, 8:00 am
- Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station - Paul Rusling January 17, 2022, 11:26 am
  - Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station - Mike Simmonds January 17, 2022, 11:56 am
    - Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station - James McGregor January 17, 2022, 4:40 pm
  - Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station - ruud January 17, 2022, 4:46 pm
    - Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station - Rod Watts January 17, 2022, 5:36 pm
      - Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station - Fred Bramley January 17, 2022, 9:55 pm
      - Re: 279 was a terrible frequency choice for a longwave radio station - ruud January 19, 2022, 7:53 pm

« Back to index

Post a Response

Please post or reply to any Radio-related subject / topic or question, all are welcome, Pirate, Legal, Web, Etc.

Hosted for FREE by Boardhost.
Create your own free message board!