A Wagga councillor has slammed the fedral government’s controversial Safe Schools program, calling it a “debauchery” of a policy. SAFER SCHOOLS?: Wagga city councillor Paul Funnell speaks out against the controversial Safe Schools programme, calling it a 'debauchery' of a policy. City councillor Paul Funnell has spoken out against the increasingly contentious program that has reignited hostile debate ahead of the federal election. Mr Funnell said rather than being an anti-bullying policy, the Safe Schools initiative would lead to a radical sexualisation of young Australian students. “This programme has nothing to do with abolishing bullying,” Mr Funnell said. “It’s disgraceful, X-rated social engineering and will see the sexualisation of our children.” The program, intended to be rolled out in primary schools across the country, is aimed at developing a safe and inclusive environment for same-sex attracted, intersex and gender diverse students, staff and families. Mr Funnell described some of the program’s suggested content as completely “ludicrous” and even, in some cases, “criminal”. “The material is completely inappropriate and does not belong in schools,” he said. “Much of this would be considered grooming if it was not wrapped up in this programme and people would be rightly arrested. “It’s ludicrous that this program teaches children that your genitals don't determine your gender and it completely warps their concept of sexuality.” Mr Funnell’s comments come just days after the Victorian government openly defied Malcolm Turnbull's attempts to amend the controversial curriculum. Wagga’s Parents and Friends of Lesbians And Gays vice president Sarah Adcock said while everyone might not support Safe Schools, it would no doubt help achieve more accepting school environments. “It’s simply about informing lesbian, gay, intersex and transgender children that there’s nothing wrong with them and letting other children see that too,” she said. “ If a child is gay, it’s important for them to feel safe and supported at school, instead of shutting themselves off from society because they’re misunderstood.” .
In accordance with the normal rules regarding copyright, I was going to quote only an appetite-wetter from the article, but I hope the Advertiser doesn’t mind my quoting the lot, as every sentence is the absolute truth in the minds of those whose minds are not clouded with the false concepts of political correctness. I think this is illustrated by the poll at the conclusion of the article, where, at the time of writing, a poll asking “Do you support the government's Safe Schools programme?” recorded the following results: yes 16.53% no 83.47% The ordinary reader seems able to easily discern the truth of the matter; why can’t the education authorities? Aren’t they supposed to be the smart ones in society? Why can’t the various governments? Aren’t they supposed to be supporting the will of the electorate?
Excerpt from the New World Order written in 1989 by Ralph Epperson
the family:
homosexual marriages will be legalized; parents will not be allowed to raise their children (the state will all women will be employed by the state and not allowed to be "homemakers"; divorce will become exceedingly easy and monogynous marriage will be slowly phased out; the workplace: the government will become the owner of all of the factors of production; the private ownership of property will be outlawed; religion: religion will be outlawed and believers will be either eliminated or imprisoned; there will be a new religion: the worship of man and his mind; all will believe in the new religion;
--Previous Message-- : In The Daily Advertiser of May 16, 2016, an : article by Amelia Mills titled Wagga : councillor Paul Funnell slams Safe Schools : program as 'debaucher reads: A Wagga : councillor has slammed the fedral : government’s controversial Safe Schools : program, calling it a “debauchery” of a : policy. : SAFER SCHOOLS?: Wagga city councillor Paul : Funnell speaks out against the controversial : Safe Schools programme, calling it a : 'debauchery' of a policy. : City councillor Paul Funnell has spoken out : against the increasingly contentious program : that has reignited hostile debate ahead of : the federal election. : Mr Funnell said rather than being an : anti-bullying policy, the Safe Schools : initiative would lead to a radical : sexualisation of young Australian students. : “This programme has nothing to do with : abolishing bullying,” Mr Funnell said. “It’s : disgraceful, X-rated social engineering and : will see the sexualisation of our children.” : The program, intended to be rolled out in : primary schools across the country, is aimed : at developing a safe and inclusive : environment for same-sex attracted, intersex : and gender diverse students, staff and : families. : Mr Funnell described some of the program’s : suggested content as completely “ludicrous” : and even, in some cases, “criminal”. : “The material is completely inappropriate : and does not belong in schools,” he said. : “Much of this would be considered grooming : if it was not wrapped up in this programme : and people would be rightly arrested. : “It’s ludicrous that this program teaches : children that your genitals don't determine : your gender and it completely warps their : concept of sexuality.” : Mr Funnell’s comments come just days after : the Victorian government openly defied : Malcolm Turnbull's attempts to amend the : controversial curriculum. : Wagga’s Parents and Friends of Lesbians And : Gays vice president Sarah Adcock said while : everyone might not support Safe Schools, it : would no doubt help achieve more accepting : school environments. : “It’s simply about informing lesbian, gay, : intersex and transgender children that : there’s nothing wrong with them and letting : other children see that too,” she said. “ : If a child is gay, it’s important for them : to feel safe and supported at school, : instead of shutting themselves off from : society because they’re misunderstood.” . In : accordance with the normal rules regarding : copyright, I was going to quote only an : appetite-wetter from the article, but I hope : the Advertiser doesn’t mind my quoting the : lot, as every sentence is the absolute truth : in the minds of those whose minds are not : clouded with the false concepts of political : correctness. I think this is illustrated by : the poll at the conclusion of the article, : where, at the time of writing, a poll asking : “Do you support the government's Safe : Schools programme?” recorded the following : results: : yes 16.53% : no 83.47% : The ordinary reader seems able to easily : discern the truth of the matter; why can’t : the education authorities? Aren’t they : supposed to be the smart ones in society? : Why can’t the various governments? Aren’t : they supposed to be supporting the will of : the electorate? : :