Previous Message
I wasn't aware it was an argument, Faz.
True, it's now turned into a kind of lecture.
Previous Message
I thought it was a discussion,
LOL
Previous Message
during which it has been established
Ah, that passive voice again. The sound of not taking personal responsibility for your assertions.
Previous Message
that you are content to be a member of a church made in your own image which in turn is made in image of the ephemeral mores of the secular society.
When you pray to you thank God you're 'not like them'?
Previous Message
I thought that was selling yourself way short and attempted to provide some prompt toward authentic, sacrificial sonship commensurate with the true freedom of the children of God.
(Save me sarcastic protestations about my methods, please).
Methods?
Previous Message
On the other matter, since returning here I have accused you of ad-hominem once and as stated a couple of times, that was in the context of your resorting even to that, having nothing else as a comeback to John.
Well, you accused me of it and when I asked for specifics you went silent. Here's your opportunity again. (Be ready for me to claim that it was a 'method'.)
Previous Message
In that same time, you have called me a liar, a hypocrite and lacking substance, so I think maybe you might protest just a bit too much about my 'pontification' on that score.
Again, be specific. I have said things about
your arguments (discussions?) but not about you.
Previous Message
Anyway, as ever, prayers work better than anything we might attempt to provide and you shall remain in mine.
Over and out.
Drat, and I was going to give you the last word. Oh well ... too late.