Well, Pete, your argumentation is standard fare offered to placate the belief that judgment of those who are determined to be worthy of judgment is justifiable, when the source for that judgment is biblical.
Over the centuries wise sages have written that a taste of righteousness can be easily perverted into an overweening sense of self-righteousness, and judgmentalism the result of believing that their behaviour is beyond reproach sufficient to justify their holier than thou judgments.
end
Why is it that only the person who bases their morality on the Bible or Church teaching deemed "judgemental"?
There is far more judging going on these days from the non-Biblical secular, atheist, relativist Church of Woke for "sins" against the "holy commandments" of "tolerance" "diversity" & "equality".
This isn't about "judgementalism" or "tolerance" as the secularists/atheists/relativists claim. If it was, the secularists would have to show complete tolerance and non-judgementalism of all moral positions to avoid themselves being hypocritical. It's really about competing moralities: Christian versus Secular. The secularists however are trapped in the hypocritical, illogical nonsense of a moral system based on "tolerance" which is basically self-contradictory.
Responses
« Back to index | View thread »