The author of the article I quoted from states, "we have chosen to expose a positive, unbiased version of the facts." Hardly playing the blame game or using scapegoats. I do question why the significant connection between Freemasonry, the Enlightenment and Liberalism is something that is rarely discussed or mentioned. In order to understand where we are and how we got here one requires the COMPLETE account. The history books are oddly quiet regarding Freemasonry's considerable contribution to the ideas and events that have shaped the political landscape of much of the world particularly in the West. Why? To assert one is scapegoating Freemasonry for daring to question it and its role in the world is unusually defensive and inadequate.
Well, John, the institutional church has been the erstwhile instructor in all matters secretive, especially now that the cover ups on clerical sexual abuse are being exposed, for the human race to contemplate dirty laundry in all its tragic manifestations of dirty secrets left to gather dust behind the curtains.
You already knew this... when attempting to play the blame game using a convenient scapegoat.
end
Responses
« Back to index | View thread »