There has been no attempt to hide the fact that the article expresses incredulity that the Pope could confer such an award on such a high-profile advocate of contempt for the Church’s teachings. What I was commenting on after your fist post was this example of inanity: ”To imply that Lilianne Ploumen is a one dimensional character devoid of all human compassion, might well be an opinion loaded with bias.” Who implied that, and even if someone had done so, of what relevance would it be?
--Previous Message--
: It is also arguable that the focus of the
: article's criticism is Pope Francis, and not
: Lilianne Ploumen who is merely the catalyst.
:
: To evade the obvious, is to believe that the
: reader is devoid of intelligence.
:
:
Responses
« Back to index | View thread »