
Posted by rich
![]()
on March 24, 2008, 7:57 pm, in reply to "Re: A TRUE STRAIN, OR NOT."
86.3.62.X
--Previous Message--
: . I agree with you it's like the doodle
: crosses. these dogs actually sell for big
: bucks. Karen
: --Previous Message--
: An interesting topic. Lets be honest,from
: the
: various Olde Bulldogge lines, which lines
: are truely breeding true, and instantly
: recognisable as a true strain?
: Many lines that call themselves strains or
: even breeds, prove that they are not, just
: by studying the vast array of variation
: within the said strain.
: I've found that the nearest to being a true
: strain, is that of the Leavitt Olde English
: Bulldog. Another line to be instantly
: recognisable is Chadde Joliceur's Gargoyle
: line.
: The Victorian bulldog seems to breed fairly
: true as does the Aussie Bulldog.
:
: What does everyone else think?
:
: Today there seems to be a real desire to
: have the glory from developing your own
: strain, but without all of the years of
: selective breeding to go with it. Cross 2
: dogs together and call it a breed.
:
: In my opinion most of the best looking old times are straight crosses anyway. If you dont keep putting bulldog into them you just end up with little mastifs or shit looking boxers.
:
:
:
:
:
:
Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread