[ Post a Response | *************** The Olde Bull Inn *************** ]
Posted by Joe H on March 21, 2008, 12:28 pm
Message modified by board administrator March 21, 2008, 6:12 pm
An interesting topic. Lets be honest,from the various Olde Bulldogge lines, which lines are truely breeding true, and instantly recognisable as a true strain?
Many lines that call themselves strains or even breeds, prove that they are not, just by studying the vast array of variation within the said strain.
I've found that the nearest to being a true strain, is that of the Leavitt Olde English Bulldog. Another line to be instantly recognisable is Chadde Joliceur's Gargoyle line.
The Victorian bulldog seems to breed fairly true as does the Aussie Bulldog.
What does everyone else think?
Today there seems to be a real desire to have the glory from developing your own strain, but without all of the years of selective breeding to go with it. Cross 2 dogs together and call it a breed.
Message Thread:
« Back to thread