[ Post a Response | *************** The Olde Bull Inn *************** ]
Posted by Joe H
on January 23, 2008, 7:09 pm, in reply to "SIZE"
217.40.24.X
I LIKE THEM SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 60 AND 90LBS, ANYTHING MUCH SMALLER AND I THINK THEY LACK SUBSTANCE, MUCH LARGER AND I THINK YOUR GETTING INTO AMERICAN BULLDOG AND BULLMASTIFF TERRITORY.
--Previous Message--
: THOUGHT ID SEE HOW MY FELLOW BULLDOGERS FELT
: ABOUT SIZE.
: WERE ALL PRODUCEING HEALTHY ACTIVE BULLDOGS
: ALONG THE LINES OF THE MONOGRAPH BULLDOG.
: ALTHOUGH THEY ARE VERY GOOD RECREATIONS OF
: THE LONG LOST BULLDOG OF THE 1880S. BUT THEY
: ARE BIGGER, THE BULLDOG OF THIS ERA WAS A
: LOT SMALLER
: SO DO WE KEEP THEM THE SIZE THEY ARE NOW.
: WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE SIZE MUST NOT
: GET BIGGER,OR DO WE GRADUALY GO FOR A SLIGHT
: REDUCTION IN SIZE BETWEEN THE TWO SIZES
: IE CURRENT SIZE MALE AVE 70 LBS
: OLD SIZE 50 LBS
: SO COMPROMISE AT 60 LBS.
: SO THE DOGS ARE A BIT MORE HISTORICALLY
: ACCURATE
: DISCUSS
:
Message Thread: