Posted by jaeger rep on December 15, 2008, 11:59 am, in reply to "Judge Me"
72.66.78.X
x. Name reference (0-4) 2- I'm really really torn, here. It's not that the reference is bad-- it's really good. However, in that line 'in a time and place', it's esoteric, I don't think I would've gotten that as a name reference even if I knew who you were after. Therefore, I'm going to give you a two instead of a three. Sorry.
x. Harem reference (0-4) 2- This is a little out there, even now that it's explained to me. Two.
x. Rank reference* (0-4) 1- Though tying socialite to aristocrat is good in my eyes, calling them blue-bloods is a little bit more out there. I can think of a few more groups which have been known as bluebloods, in addition to aristocrats. Maybe if you had made a few more references to aristocratic lifestyles, but with just 'blue blood,' I can only give you one point.
x. History/Achievements reference (0-4) 3- New to andarin is good, nad since J is new too, i can see this one.
x. Filler** (-2-0)
x. Extras*** (varies/MAX 2.5) 1, for her class reference. The other two references went over my head, even when explained. Maybe if you had specified something about elements or an attack in addition to druids?
TOTAL: 9/16
Failing, but just barely?
3
Message Thread:
« Back to thread